Voice-over narration would certainly have taken the video to a different level. I have a friend who's done broadcasting in high school. Ryan has that quintessential Midwest accent we've come to associate with broadcast sound in America. He's agreed to work on my projects; I just have not chosen to expend more time on finessing the product. But, yes, if you're in the area I would love to avail me of your talents, too. In this exciting age of the wildly creative use of moving images and sound, taboos are as quickly demoted as they are promoted. Standards are for those times we don't feel creative. We fall back on dogma when we can't experience the real thing - call it God or art or, in Andalusia, duende. (My company name is Duende Arts.)It is precisely because I recognize that knowledge advances that I adopt a tentative approach to the current teachings of the Catholic Church. I am not anti-Catholic, or anti-religion but after struggling 30 years against conclusions that went against the grain in Western-tradition-bound societies I can't go back. Once you open your eyes and see Ursa Major, Orion, and Scorpius (I'm a Scorpio, by the way, which may describe but not explain my obsession with certain topics like religion) in the sky, you cannot not see them again. St. Paul wrote that the woman or man who accepts Jesus as Messiah or Christ ceases to be a child and becomes a fully functioning human being. Good enough for those times but not, I don't think, for the 21st century when the challenges to human beings have changed. While much of the world's people still struggle with the same hardships as the Mediterranean peoples of the first 300 years (as measured by Pope Gregory XIII's modification of Julius Caesar's calendar) today the challenge to Western democracies is different. We must lead the way for religions to co-exist rather than fight each other. (The debate about building a mosque in downtown Manhattan is a painful example.)
More, religions have to share ethical space with other branches of human expression like science, politics and psychology. It's a delicate balance because only by immersing ourselves in a tradition do we advance in its path but to immerse ourselves like that is often to forget there are other rivers in which to be baptized into enlightened life. But I don't think (as even U.S. North District Chief Judge, Vaughn Walker, writes in his impressive ruling on gay marriages in California) that morality needs to be based solely on religious beliefs anymore. Religion has up to this point been the one authority for what constitutes morality but when religious beliefs (Christian or Muslim or Hindu or whatever) conflict we must arrive at more Paul-like standards for ethical conduct.
On the flip side I continue to admire and love many aspects of Christianity, especially its ancient liturgies and its many centuries of literature on alternative meanings to biological life or how many angels can dance on a pin head. For me theology is an expression of human creativity, is as much art as Debussy's impressionistic music (did you know that he was music teacher to Nadeshda von Meck's children? She was Tchaikovsky's patroness and muse and his music was altogether different) or a Jackson Pollack canvas. But artistic truth is one thing, and truth that hurts people and destroys life because it is false is a whole other thing. History is not just intellectual exercise in futility. We can't know what happened before our time but we can take hints from what we discover that we not commit the same mistakes again. We do, but that's no excuse for not trying!
Your example of parenting styles illustrates how beliefs abetted by science or, as I believe, forces beyond our intellectual comprehension (thumb and forefinger creates our unique prehensile ability, thus to comprehend is to grasp) change. Those of us with some education must set an example to take care with what we believe. Because I still believe education, the exposure of our minds to different, far-ranging ideas, can help us avoid becoming tyrannical with our views. The age of tyranny must end. To hold fast to destructive beliefs makes literal the expression "diehard." Religions should foster aliveness, the capacity to grow and change with grace, not death.
"I may be simple but I am not like that..."
I don't know what this refers to. Was I calling you simple? I happen to think that to live simply is the hardest thing to do. I recall Oscar Wilde: "I have the simplest of tastes. I am always satisfied with the best."
After a life-changing experience at a nine-day Buddhist meditation retreat (the hardest thing to date I've done!) in 1986, it was my friend, Jean Alice, who was at the time prioress of Our Lady of Carmel on Cold Spring Road (where the VAH is located in Indianapolis) who helped guide me back to "normal" life. In meetings with me for close to a year, she used the metaphors of Teresa of Avilá and Juan de la Cruz to help me come to terms with ineffable Buddhist concepts. Once she told me that her Catholic faith was for her like a helicopter. It was a vehicle to take her someplace. Her helicopter metaphor mirrors the Buddha's metaphor of Dharma (there is no word for Buddhism in Indian and other Asian languages; an -ism is a Eurocentric concept) as a boat to take the practitioner to "the other shore." Buddhism enabled me to come to peace with the contradictions of the Judeo-Christian tradition and Jean Alice, bless her heart, was there to help me pilot the helicopter.
In exchange, at her request, I led a Buddhist meditation retreat for her and the other sisters at the monastery. Those nuns were nothing like the brown-clad Carmelites whom I glimpsed through the fence next to the giant Catholic church in my hometown. (I'm sad to say that the nuns gave up their monastery to the archdiocese a few years ago. They were all growing too old to maintain it and the community was not attracting enough young novices to make it work. I am devastated.) To be fair, Vatican II had come and gone, bringing new life to the church while, in my view, also taking some things away. That's the nature of change.
Since then I've tried various spiritual disciplines, including Ignatian exercises. For 2 years I apprenticed myself at a conservative Quaker meeting even as I undertook the study of scriptures of various religions. I went back to the Pali canon of Buddhist scriptures, read on the scholarship of both the Torah and the Christian Bible, and even did a video interview of my boss, the Muslim psychiatrist who owned the clinic where I worked for seven years. I danced around Pagan bonfires, sweated in First Nation sweat lodges, taught at the Spiritual Life center of our largest Methodist mega-church, retreated at St. Meinrad every few months, attended fairy gatherings, etc. The journey has been wildly exhilarating. I honor the crazy way of the Spirit even as I've retained my quizzical eye, remained the Doubting Thomas when interacting with Spirit. I'm not Carl Jung. A half century can make that much difference!
In Buddhism doubt is enshrined as a virtue on the path. It took acquaintance with another Eastern religion (Christianity was born in the East, what we refer to now as the Middle East) to move away from dogmatism. Heresy comes from the Greek meaning "able to choose." The Catholic church, then the only Christian organization, changed the word to mean wrong belief. I think it's time to forge new standards for ethical living. Religions continue to have value in our pluralistic societies but we must make room for other arbiters of right living. At a time when we have growing access to the varieties of human insights, it is in my view a mortal (i.e. leading to death, muerto in Spanish, mortis in Latin) sin to live in ignorance.
The picture owes inspiration to Chinese scroll paintings where human beings are tiny in the expansive landscape. They are constant reminders how little we are in the total view of the universe. It in this Spirit I offer you these thoughts.





